The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KROS · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KROS | MOV | INSP | COHR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) | 56 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 | 31 | 85 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 91 | 99 (highest) | 58 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 53 (highest) | 0 | 15 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 73 | — |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 33 | 24 | 60 (highest) |
| No price data | 62% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 1999% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $222M | $771M | $1.8B | $54.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |