The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

KRSA · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PGEN · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SCNX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ABUS · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureKRSAPGENSCNXABUS
Moat Score (0–100)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend33152053 (highest)
Pricing power—99 (highest)69—
Returns on capital004 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)282855 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)24
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$124M$2.8B$10.8M$928M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025