The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KRUS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ZCAR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KRUS | XHR | CNNE | ZCAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 75 (highest) | 5 | 39 |
| Pricing power | — | 26 (highest) | 22 | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 46 | 64 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | 831% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $526M | $2.0B | $688M | $906947 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |