The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BDSX · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AXSM · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LAKE | BSPK | BDSX | AXSM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 57 | 65 (highest) | 57 |
| Pricing power | 57 (highest) | 42 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 7 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| 407% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $106M | $7807 | $182M | $12.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |