The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LE · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OFAL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

XOS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CLAR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureLEOFALXOSCLAR
Moat Score (0–100)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend1560 (highest)22
Pricing power68 (highest)29057
Returns on capital5 (highest)000
Balance-sheet safety1655 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation54 (highest)444424
419% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$359M$2.9M$23M$125M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2026FY2025FY2025