The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHWY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VSXY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | LEEN | CHWY | JAKK | VSXY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 78 | 38 | 44 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 33 | 46 | 51 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 85 (highest) | 77 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 47 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 44 | 42 | 62 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 28% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 157% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $169553 | — | $273.1M | $7.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |