The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LEU · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ZONE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LEU | CPSH | ZONE | JHIUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 50 | — | 50 |
| Pricing power | 17 | 0 | 68 (highest) | 64 |
| Returns on capital | — | 11 | 0 | 70 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 31 | 100 (highest) | 55 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| No price data | 310% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 188% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $62.4M | $48.3M | $13.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |