The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LEU · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TDAY · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LEU | TDAY | CPSH | JHX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 35 | 50 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 17 | 65 (highest) | 0 | 64 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 11 | 70 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 31 | — | 100 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 48 (highest) | 24 | 0 |
| No price data | 6% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 358% above value if growth stopped today | 257% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $951M | $69.7M | $16.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |