The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LFST · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OWLT · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TEVA · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | LFST | ITRI | OWLT | TEVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 | 54 (highest) | 53 | 53 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 69 | 47 | 69 |
| Pricing power | — | 49 | 67 | 79 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 13 (highest) | — | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 49 | 76 (highest) | 55 | 56 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 60 | 44 | 55 |
| No price data | 164% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 6187% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.6B | $3.7B | $112M | $47.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |