The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LIDR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

HYOR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FOXO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ATVK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLIDRHYORFOXOATVK
Moat Score (0–100)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend252035 (highest)
Pricing power028 (highest)
Returns on capital0009 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2828
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)28
No price dataNo price dataNo price data4424% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$51MNot reported$112M$47.9M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025