The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LIND · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
SOAR · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LIND | SOAR | CARR | RELL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 | 42 (highest) | 41 | 41 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 42 | 44 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 46 | 1 | 46 | 56 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 17 | — | 61 (highest) | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 48 | 100 (highest) | 21 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 35 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 119% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.2M | $57.6B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |