The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LION · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VENU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LION | TSQ | VENU | FLZH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 36 (highest) | 31 | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 48 (highest) | — | 11 |
| Returns on capital | 31 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $102M | $899804 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |