The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LNG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

LNT · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NEE · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MSEX · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLNGLNTNEEMSEX
Moat Score (0–100)4546 (highest)46 (highest)44
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend557886 (highest)78
Pricing power64100 (highest)——
Returns on capital28 (highest)3323
Balance-sheet safety45 (highest)04032
Capital allocation314853 (highest)43
No price data129% above value if growth stopped today119% above value if growth stopped today114% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market capNot reported$17.6B$166.2B$1.0B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025