The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MIBE · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LOAR | MIBE | TH | ONT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 | 44 (highest) | 43 | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 30 | 48 | 65 |
| Pricing power | 82 | 89 (highest) | 64 | 50 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 26 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 5 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | — | 24 | 60 (highest) |
| 2479% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 143% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 850% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $6.4B | $37.4M | $1.9B | $641M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |