The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VSBC · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LOVE | PCSV | VSBC | UNF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 17 | — | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 90 | 91 (highest) | 47 | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 25 | 76 | 100 (highest) | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 44 | 60 (highest) |
| 10% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 238% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $239M | Not reported | $2.3M | $5.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |