The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AIRT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GXO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LTCH | CVV | AIRT | GXO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 55 | 95 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 11 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 0 | 12 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 25 | 24 | 48 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 176% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $29.4M | $48.9M | $73.2M | $6.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |