The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LUCY · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NTRR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MASS · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ETST · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLUCYNTRRMASSETST
Moat Score (0–100)46 (highest)46 (highest)46 (highest)46 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend63706585 (highest)
Pricing power04387 (highest)41
Returns on capital034 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety78 (highest)2855
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2424
No price dataNo price dataNo price data26% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.9M$274358$363M$26.2M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2023FY2025FY2026