The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LVS · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HURN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | LVS | GIII | HON | HURN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 60 | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 | 38 | 46 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 59 (highest) | 54 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 77 | 42 | 100 (highest) | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 21 | 100 (highest) | 42 | 68 |
| Capital allocation | 63 | 63 | 60 | 82 (highest) |
| 94% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 140% above value if growth stopped today | 89% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $31.1B | Not reported | $154.5B | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |