The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GBR · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HPK · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LWLG | LUVU | GBR | HPK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 38 | 60 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 42 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 92 (highest) | 0 | 54 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 55 (highest) | 30 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 29 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 76% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 9% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $884M | $2.3M | $3.7M | $959M |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |