The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WW · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AIR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
IVDN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | M | WW | AIR | IVDN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 29 | 7 | 90 (highest) | 85 |
| Pricing power | 61 | 89 (highest) | 24 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 49 | 88 (highest) | — | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 60 | — | 34 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 24 | 60 (highest) | 24 |
| 52% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 414% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.1B | $133M | $5.1B | $9.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |