The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EONR · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DEC · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MAGN | WLK | EONR | DEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | 27 | 20 | 24 |
| Pricing power | 1 | 5 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 20 | 9 | 61 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 14 |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 46 | 44 | 0 |
| No price data | 3% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 82% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $393M | $8.1B | Not reported | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |