The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAPS · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MAPS | HFUS | TDC | IMMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 85 (highest) | 47 | 68 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 46 | 88 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 83 | 93 (highest) | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 70 | 68 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 43 | 58 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 34% above high estimate | 64% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | — | $100.1M | $2.8B | $208.3M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |