The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAPS · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MAPS | RSKIA | FISV | ETSY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 84 | 94 (highest) | 51 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 82 | 100 (highest) | 99 |
| Returns on capital | — | 18 | 31 | 91 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 32 | 31 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) | 64 |
| No price data | 120% above value if growth stopped today | 49% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 93% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $177M | $25.4B | $8.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |