The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BBXIA · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MBUU | PLBY | ATRO | BBXIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 35 | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 20 | 80 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 29 | 86 (highest) | 18 | — |
| Returns on capital | 90 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 29 | 28 | 56 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 10 | 44 | 20 | 64 (highest) |
| 52% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $431M | $120M | Not reported | $48.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |