The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AIXN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MDLK | SARO | AIXN | LEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 | 42 (highest) | 41 | 41 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 78 (highest) | 20 | 69 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 28 | 74 (highest) | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 19 | — | 39 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 22 | 28 | 52 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 40 |
| No price data | 620% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 37% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.6M | $9.6B | $6.5M | $7.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |