The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EOG · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DJCO · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MH | EOG | DJCO | LZB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 | 66 (highest) | 65 | 64 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 | 62 | 100 (highest) | 30 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | — | — | 69 |
| Returns on capital | 22 | 64 | 0 | 89 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 50 | 94 | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 44 | 60 | 61 |
| 17% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 25% above value if growth stopped today | 11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.7B | Not reported | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |