The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MIBE · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BETA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | MIBE | LESL | BETA | TH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 30 | 16 | 50 (highest) | 48 |
| Pricing power | 89 | 64 | 90 (highest) | 64 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 88 (highest) | 0 | 26 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | — | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | 96% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 104% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $37.4M | $11.5M | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |