The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MLGO · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SKIL · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EFX · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MLGO | SKIL | NVVE | EFX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | — | 37 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 25 | 98 (highest) | 58 | — |
| Returns on capital | 50 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 26 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 31 | 44 | 54 (highest) |
| 670% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 144% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $183M | $55.9M | $6.7M | $20.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2022 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |