The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MOD · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
HURN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | MOD | HURN | DAKT | ACCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 59 | 60 (highest) | 59 | 58 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 (highest) | 90 | 86 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 15 | 47 | 34 | 99 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 49 (highest) | 11 | 18 | 22 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 65 | 68 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 71 | 82 (highest) | 56 | 60 |
| 633% above value if growth stopped today | 89% above value if growth stopped today | 1145% above value if growth stopped today | 36% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $12.8B | $1.9B | $941M | $25.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |