The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MOJO · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MKC · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
STZ · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MOJO | MKC | CWGL | STZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 | 49 (highest) | 46 | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 79 (highest) | 50 | — |
| Pricing power | 68 | 66 | 66 | 85 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 20 | 0 | 22 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 29 | 22 | 55 (highest) | 23 |
| Capital discipline | — | 59 | 61 (highest) | 42 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 48% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 152% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $8.1M | $14.1B | $87.3M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |