The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MPTI · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MPTI | NTAP | NVDA | ROL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 80 | 95 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 98 (highest) | 93 | 86 |
| Returns on capital | 88 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 85 | 100 (highest) | 92 |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 98 (highest) | 72 | 80 |
| 634% above value if growth stopped today | 144% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1398% above value if growth stopped today | 232% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $285M | $32.9B | $5.03T | $18.6B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |