The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MRTN · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ULCC · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MRTN | NOV | NPWR | ULCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 75 (highest) | 20 | 65 |
| Pricing power | — | 1 | 70 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 35 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 61 | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 0 | 53 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| 34% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 154% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.0B | $6.8B | Not reported | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |