The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

MSEX · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NEE · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LNG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OKE · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureMSEXNEELNGOKE
Moat Score (0–100)4446 (highest)4543
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend78865590 (highest)
Pricing power64 (highest)29
Returns on capital23328 (highest)13
Balance-sheet safety324045 (highest)3
Capital allocation43533180 (highest)
121% above value if growth stopped today146% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data99% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$1.0B$187.0BNot reported$58.7B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025