The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ONEI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PRG · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MSGM | ONEI | PRG | AMTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | 57 | 39 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 80 (highest) | 70 | — | 29 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | — | 68 (highest) | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 28 | 43 | 52 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 48 | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 31% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 140% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $26.4M | $7M | $1.2B | $4.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |