The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

MSGS · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SGA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

STUB · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AIFA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureMSGSSGASTUBAIFA
Moat Score (0–100)3132 (highest)3130
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend58 (highest)295050
Pricing power————
Returns on capital6812 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety1555 (highest)2828
Capital allocation44 (highest)363744 (highest)
No price data48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)739% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market capNot reported$52.9M$1.9B$141M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025