The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLX · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MTDR | CF | TPR | CLX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 76 (highest) | 64 | 50 | 56 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 23 | 98 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 61 | 77 | 97 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 45 | 82 (highest) | 24 | 60 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 64 (highest) | 40 | 57 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 33% below high estimate | 43% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 185% above high estimate | 128% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $6.3B | $19.2B | $29.7B | $11.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |