The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MTUS | TGEN | QURT | KNX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 35 | 13 | 46 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 | 60 (highest) | 28 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 14 (highest) | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 28 | 55 | 34 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 37 | 28 |
| No price data | No price data | 9644% above value if growth stopped today | 388% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $96.1M | $7.9M | $11.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |