The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BNZI · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
JOCM · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MU | BNZI | JOCM | SANM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 86 (highest) | 57 | 45 | 69 |
| Pricing power | 37 | 91 | 100 (highest) | 24 |
| Returns on capital | 61 (highest) | — | — | 53 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 96 (highest) | 55 | 78 | 94 |
| Capital discipline | 28 | 44 | 24 | 68 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 879% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | 163% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $1.03T | $23.2M | $77.5M | $11.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |