The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MWYN | KNX | RR | MTRN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 | 35 (highest) | 34 | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 68 (highest) | 20 | 59 |
| Pricing power | 75 | — | 100 (highest) | 30 |
| Returns on capital | 18 (highest) | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 34 | 28 | 23 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 28 | 24 | 51 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 409% above high estimate | No price data | 273% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $14.7M | $12.3B | $195.1M | $5.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |