The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PARR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MYE | KNF | AVNT | PARR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 48 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 78 (highest) | 34 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 52 (highest) | 24 | 36 | — |
| Returns on capital | 45 | 62 (highest) | 61 | 36 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 27 | 100 (highest) | 53 |
| Capital allocation | 39 | 55 (highest) | 13 | 29 |
| 189% above value if growth stopped today | 153% above value if growth stopped today | 36% above value if growth stopped today | 8% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $4.4B | $3.4B | $3.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |