The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

MYSZ · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WHEN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NSP · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

STCB · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureMYSZWHENNSPSTCB
Moat Score (0–100)40 (highest)40 (highest)40 (highest)40 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend63 (highest)605660
Pricing power3970 (highest)2670 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)2855 (highest)28
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2344 (highest)
No price dataNo price data26% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$1.9M$55.1M$1.8BNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2024FY2025FY2025