The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NDSN

Score temporarily unavailable — we couldn't reach the scoring service, and we won't show a stale or guessed number.

UNP · Industrials · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HWKN · Industrials · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

PLPC · Industrials · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

MeasureNDSNUNPHWKNPLPC
Moat Score (0–100)66 (highest)66 (highest)65
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend7098 (highest)63
Pricing power2856 (highest)
Returns on capital81 (highest)4228
Balance-sheet safety3581100 (highest)
Capital allocation7980 (highest)80 (highest)
No price data143% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)245% above value if growth stopped today218% above value if growth stopped today
Market capNot reported$182.3B$2.9B$1.5B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025

Rows show "—" where a company isn't covered or its score couldn't be fetched — we don't fill gaps with guesses.