The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NGTF · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FGI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VATE · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NNBR · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNGTFFGIVATENNBR
Moat Score (0–100)17 (highest)17 (highest)17 (highest)16
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend151051 (highest)40
Pricing power030 (highest)8
Returns on capital20 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)000
Capital discipline24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price data62% below high estimateNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$5.2M$8.1M$121.1M$174.7M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025