The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NGVT · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

OXY · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TLF · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CBT · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureNGVTOXYTLFCBT
Moat Score (0–100)57 (highest)57 (highest)57 (highest)57 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend262761 (highest)56
Pricing power5997 (highest)9537
Returns on capital100 (highest)457
Balance-sheet safety363655 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation64697279 (highest)
2979% above value if growth stopped today11% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)3% below value if growth stopped today30% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$2.6B$54.0B$19.3M$4.8B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025