The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NMHI · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SXC · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RYZ · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

COSM · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureNMHISXCRYZCOSM
Moat Score (0–100)2122 (highest)22 (highest)21
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend13421548 (highest)
Pricing power030 (highest)0
Returns on capital2338 (highest)6
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)0028 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)222424
No price dataNo price data2% below value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$112853Not reported$1.6B$8.2M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025