The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JCTC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
WYNN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NORD | FLL | JCTC | WYNN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 50 | 10 | 75 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 71 | 100 (highest) | 27 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 37 (highest) | 17 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 44 | 45 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 177% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $43M | $84.2M | Not reported | $10.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |