The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BOX · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NOW | CRDO | BOX | TDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 80 | 75 | 45 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 88 | 98 | 88 |
| Returns on capital | 35 | 7 | — | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 60 | 70 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 80 (highest) | 49 | 58 |
| 826% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 239% above value if growth stopped today | 31% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $146.6B | $33.2B | $5.4B | $2.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |