The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NRC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AIRO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
RMTG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CWH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NRC | AIRO | RMTG | CWH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 | 51 (highest) | 50 | 50 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 66 (highest) | 59 | 60 | — |
| Pricing power | — | 94 (highest) | 62 | 26 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 0 | — | 90 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 30 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 4 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| 38% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $476M | $213M | $1.2M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |