The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NRIS · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DEC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ALOY · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KRO · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureNRISDECALOYKRO
Moat Score (0–100)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)24
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend272428 (highest)
Pricing power47 (highest)9
Returns on capital061 (highest)040
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)1428 (highest)0
Capital allocation4402445 (highest)
No price data84% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data35% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$14.2M$1.0B$30.3M$760M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025