The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

NUE · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SCSC · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PANL · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HLMN · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureNUESCSCPANLHLMN
Moat Score (0–100)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)45 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend19432969 (highest)
Pricing power025 (highest)——
Returns on capital—1039 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety7486 (highest)5565
Capital allocation86 (highest)615744
16% above value if growth stopped today14% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)65% above value if growth stopped today167% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$58.6B$1.2B$531M$1.4B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025